|
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
Is Bush so stupid so as to not know Econ 101 arguments against minimum wage laws? If his handlers advised him not to voice them, they should have given a better obfuscation than his demented rambling about education. A case can be made that in the future it might be difficult to use general revenue funds to pay off both Social Security IOUs *and* a large national debt, but Kerry's exploitation(asserting that a rise in current general revenues will "save Social Security") of the idiocy of many Americans should earn him a long time in Hell. And, of course, a vulnerability of a financial scheme to withdrawal of funds from recent participants is a pretty good indication of a Ponzi scheme. One can argue whether or it is better for large numbers of citizens to be vested in government IOUs or private financial instruments. And isn't the assertion that women earn only 70 per cent of that earned by men for doing the "same work" a monumental whopper? There is a big diff, of course, between "equal pay for equal work" sentiments and debased totalitarian desires for "comparable worth."
"Separate and unequal school sytem"-right- private schools which have the right to retain students at will and public schools which must and *should* give "due process"(tho it makes a difference who runs a public school and its corresponding judicial system) to predatory scumbag students. And the Kerrys and Kennedys never worry that their spawn will have to sit in the hellholes which they helped create.
I can only hope that voters find Bush's lack of articulation more appealing than Kerry's lies and (hackneyed term appropriate)phoniness. "Integrity, integrity, integrity.....cough...wheeze...choke....is for....gurgle....gasp...*&%$@!# suckers......now get your f'ing foot off my oxygen tube, Lurch."
|
|